Late last year, the review editor for the German library publication BuB Forum Bibliothek und Information asked me to review the book Catalogue 2.0: The Future of the Library Catalogue (n.b.- I serve on BuB‘s editorial board as the lone non-European). Typically, when I write for German publication, I write directly in German, which kind editors then slightly polish to remove some of my infidelities. This time, it seemed to make more sense to review a book written in English in English, my thought being that I could then post the English original for anyone interested. It took me a while to remember this, but I’ve finally managed to do that. Feel free to download and distribute this review (CC-BY, as noted on the PDF).
An interesting sidenote: this work was published by ALA Neal-Schuman. I wrote to them to request a review copy, noting that the review had been solicited by BuB, which is Germany’s largest circulation library publication. Not only did they not provide a review copy, they didn’t even deign to respond to the request. Despite that–and the book’s $90 price tag, which seems excessive–I’ve linked to their store above because it’s a really excellent volume that should be widely read.
This was a great last day to what has been a rich week of learning and discovery. It was certainly worth the long flight to attend DH2014. The organizers did a great job with the logistics and communication. The professional portraits they offered for free were a great idea; I’ve never had such a nice photo.
Session 6, Friday
The Dog That Didn’t Bark: A Longitudinal Study of Reading in Physical and Digital Environments
Claire Warwick, UCL
Set out to study reading and to address some of the dire statements that are out there around reading on the Web, such as ‘reading is dead’ and so on. In particular, they want to research how behaviour changes in digital environments. It was a five-year study (2009-2013) that repeats year after year, which is unprecedented in terms of studying online reading.
They studied masters students in UCL Department of Information Studies programs. They used a diary study method, where students kept track of everything they read, where they were, the medium, how long, time of day, and made comments about their reading. In all, there were 1261 episodes of reading (628 digital and 633 analogue), with 5.13/student on average (5.11 digital/5.15 analogue). Of the 216 total students, 171 were female, with both sexes having the same response rate (56%). Women had more reading episodes on average, however. Their results also showed that reading habits don’t necessarily follow age assumptions, in other words, there was no trend that showed that older students read more than younger students. Read more…
Today featured the panels I’ve noted below, as well as two excellent poster sessions. Saw many things that gave me ideas and/or inspiration, and took numerous pictures that I immediately emailed to colleagues who aren’t here.
Session 4, Thursday
MicroPasts: Co-creation and Participatory Public Archaeology
Daniel Pett, British Museum
All open: open data, open source. All built on a variety of OS platforms: WordPress, Pybossa, neighbor.ly, and Discourse. About 15 GitHub repos, which host various parts of MicroPasts. Read more…
My notes from Digital Humanities will likely be copious, so it seems to make sense to segment them by day. As always, any mistakes are my inability to listen and type and I’m more than happy to correct any botched or twisted points below.
Session 1, Wednesday
Digital Cultural Heritage and the Healing of a Nation: Digital Sudan
Marilyn Deegan, King’s College London
Sudan’s cultural heritage is not well known, although it reaches back >4000 years. Commonly heard: did you know Sudan has more pyramids than Egypt? Its cultural history is as rich as Greece, Rome, Egypt, but suffers from lack of knowledge outside the country. Kush kingdom, Napata kingdom, Meroitic kingdom, Nubian kingdoms: visually and textually related (similar script) to Egypt’s culture. The Nubian kingdom originally resisted Islamic invaders, but eventually fell and an Islamic era ensued, lasting into the 14th century. The cultural influences are varied and profound. Read more…
As is pretty much the norm for a professional CV, somewhere in the past I draw a line in the work experience and only show the jobs that have “relevance” to the work I might seek. Really, who needs to know my long and detailed history in the food service industry? I’d rather forget some of it myself.
On Facebook I recently saw one of those little “do this in your timeline” challenges where one was supposed to list the first ten jobs they had had or something like that. As I mentally went through my list, I got both something of a laugh and had a small epiphany, that being that no work experience is ever really irrelevant. Many of my work habits–conscientiousness, teamwork, dedication–were established long before I began working in libraries. So, here’s an attempt at an “irrelevant work experience” listing, in chronological order and starting at age 12:
- newspaper delivery, Grand Junction Daily Sentinel
- handyman, custodian, and bindery, IBC printing
- busboy, La Fonda de Acebo
- busboy, Elly May’s Kitchen
- cook, Elly May’s Kitchen (best breakfast, 1984!)
- waiter, Elly May’s Kitchen
- emergency room volunteer, Swedish Medical Center
- bindery and delivery, Arapahoe Printing and Typesetting
- mail room assistant, Colorado College
- Bernoulli drive assembly line, Iomega
- ski and bike hardgood sales, Christy Sports
- dishwasher, Arapahoe Cafe
- cook, Glacier National Park backcountry (best and most physically demanding job I’ll ever have, most likely)
- temp work in Boulder, CO
- waiter, Le Francais
- prep cook, Alfalfa’s market
- freelance German-English translation
- English teacher, Prague and Poprad
- graduate student assistant, Washington University Library
… and at that point my “relevant” work experience that I show on my CV kicks in. Since none of this is documented in paperwork–no, I didn’t archive my W-2 forms–and happened before the era of digital photography, I’m sure I’ve forgotten this or that odd job. Still, it’s kind of fun to write this all down and mull why I did some of that work (mostly to eat and pay rent) and what impact it may have had. What is your “irrelevant” experience?
Another useful and informative CNI just ended. As I typically do, I took fairly copious notes on some of the sessions and am sharing them here.
As always with my notes, I’ve put my commentary, where possible, in italics.
Monday, December 9
Barn Raising in a Virtual World or How Innovative Approaches in Funding Led to an Architecture We Can All Use
Allan Bell, UBC; Alex Garnett, Simon Fraser; Carla Graebner, Simon Fraser; Geoff Harder, U of Alberta
Barn raising is a good metaphor for this work, not least because it is collaborative and community based. As it turns out, between BC and Alberta, one has a wide range of local resources at hand for such a project, both informal and formal. These range from code4libBC to CARL and the Council of Pacific and Prairie University Libraries (COPPUL). Within these various entities, and there are more than I’ve mentioned here, there is a variety of expertise at hand in working groups, initiatives, project groups, etc. Read more…